Lawsuit against Priests Spills across Border
Evaluations of the Two Men Accused of Molestation Are Being Fought over in U.S., Canadian Courts
By Mark Guydish
Times Leader [Scranton PA]
October 8, 2004
SCRANTON - The legal battle between two Diocese of Scranton priests and the man who accuses them of sexual abuse has spread into three courtrooms and two countries. So far, the priests are losing.
The civil lawsuit started in the U.S. Middle District court, where a man identified as John Doe and his parents accused the Revs. Eric Ensey and Carlos Urrutigoity of molesting him when he was a teenager.
The priests helped found the Society of St. John, which first settled in St. Gregory's Academy - a school for boys in Elmhurst attended by Doe - before moving to Shohola, Pike County. The alleged abuse began at St. Gregory's.
But the case has sprawled beyond the Middle District Court in Scranton because of psychological evaluations done on the two priests in Canada. Doe's attorney pushed for the right to see those documents, contending that doctor-patient privilege does not apply because results were shared with then-Bishop James Timlin.
Middle District Court Judge John E. Jones III agreed. Mandating tight confidentiality rules, he ordered Urrutigoity's evaluation results turned over. He delayed ruling on Ensey's results because he had not seen them.
The priests' attorneys appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals based in Philadelphia. A three-judge panel recently rejected the appeal, but the attorneys are trying to have the appeal heard "en banc," meaning by all the third circuit judges. The odds of an en banc hearing are slim.
While the appeal winds through the third circuit, based in Philadelphia, the two sides are duking it out in the Superior Court of Ontario, Canada, where the priests' attorneys have tried to stop Judge Jones from seeing Ensey's evaluation.
Doe's attorney asked Jones to file an order that would essentially meet Canadian legal criteria to force the evaluation's release. In a ruling this week, Jones agreed to consider doing that, and ordered both sides to file paperwork making their arguments.
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.
money guide of hospital products guide of international market guide of repair roof before winter guide of website income guide of secure your business guide of face makeup tools guide of jewellery arts guide of tv shows guide of best places on earth guide of job plans guide of cheap cars guide of creating products guide of women tools guide of eat less guide of car insurance process guide of sport stuff guide of garden home guide of cheap insurances guide of electronic tech guide of healthy feeding guide of what is next in fashion guide of improve company guide of tactical insurance guide of make money at home guide of development in business guide of dept loan guide of cooking secrets guide of correct companies guide of jobs with more income guide of reviews o general products guide of improving technology guide of ideal job guide of business sectors guide of dept problem guide of unlimited business guide of suitable insurance company guide of money cars guide of how to market guide of heatlhy diet tips guide of decoration tipse guide of security problems