BishopAccountability.org
 
  Me and the Rev. Richard John Neuhaus

By Jeffrey Weiss
Dallas Morning News
January 8, 2009

http://religionblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/01/me-and-the-rev-richard-john-ne.html

UNITED STATES — There can scarcely be a religion reporter who has worked over the past several decades who hasn't had occasion to talk to the Rev. Richard John Neuhaus once or thrice. He was smart, quotable and available — an irresistible combination. And as we've posted earlier, he died today.

Checking my clips, I see I talked to him about the accusations that the movie The Passion of the Christ was anti-Semitic, potential problems with the "zero tolerance" rule the American Catholic bishops passed concerning sexual abuse, and the profound crisis that the priestly abuse scandal posed to the church. I'll post excerpts from those stories at the jump.

On the Mel Gibson "Passion" movie:

Some Passion defenders say attacks are mostly from people who just don't like Christianity. Many Christians simply believe their faith reflects God's will better than modern Judaism.

"Some people are saying, 'Either you cannot tell the Christian story because it clashes with my story or you must accommodate the Christian story to make it less repugnant to my story,'" said the Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, editor of the conservative religious magazine First Things.

But that's not the point, Mr. Briskman of the Anti-Defamation League said.

"The issue is not about Jewish sensibility," he said. "The issue is whether this movie can be used the way Passion plays have been used historically, in a way that is hurtful to the Jewish community."

Sensitivity guidelines

Dr. Swidler, the Vatican and others have developed guidelines for presenting Passion plays that are more sensitive to Jews. Mr. Gibson has not said whether he consulted any of those guidelines.

Will any of them be reflected in Mr. Gibson's film? Those who have seen early versions disagree. Pogroms in the past don't necessarily demand changes now, Father Neuhaus said.

On the "zero tolerance" policy:

Simple zero tolerance runs counter to a theology that believes in the inevitability of imperfection and the possibility of change and redemption, said the Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, editor of the

conservative Catholic journal First Things.

"There's something profoundly unnatural about that. It goes against everything we know about human nature," he said.

On the predatory priest scandal:

But conservatives such as the Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, editor of First Things magazine, victims' advocates including David Clohessy, director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, and liberals such as Frances Kissling, president of Catholics for a

Free Choice, and Linda Pieczynski of Call to Action challenged the draft for a variety of reasons.

Father Neuhaus considered the draft proposal to be spiritually inadequate because it doesn't include provisions for ensuring that priests and bishops are faithful to the doctrine of the Catholic

Church on issues including homosexuality and the bishops' leadership responsibilities.

 
 

Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.