BishopAccountability.org
 
  The Vatican Apologists Carry on

By Allison Kilkenny
True/Slant
March 29, 2010

http://trueslant.com/allisonkilkenny/2010/03/29/the-vatican-apologists-carry-on/

Now is the time the Vatican apologists will:

A) Continue their disgusting tradition of acting as apologists for child torturers and rapists, or

B) Revise their history of acting as Vatican apologists, and claim none of these accusations are surprising — and gee! — can't Catholics clean house, and send the kid-toucher priests to an island, or something?

Then there's Douthat, who heroically attempts to do both.


He half-scolds the Pope for allowing a pedophile priest to return to ministry while Benedict XVI served as archbishop of Munich in 1980. But Douthat then claims a second charge — that the Pope failed to report a Wisconsin priest who had abused 200 deaf children — is "unfair."

The case was finally forwarded to the Vatican by the archbishop of Milwaukee, Rembert Weakland, more than 20 years after the last allegation of abuse. With the approval of then-Cardinal Ratzinger's deputy, the statue of limitations was waived and a canonical trial ordered. It was only suspended because the priest was terminally ill; indeed, pretrial proceedings were halted just before he died.
Here is yet another example of the church putting its own legacy ahead of the interest of children. We're expected to believe that Ratzinger acted from a place of compassion because this pedophile was terminally ill.

Where was Ratzinger's compassion for the 200 deaf children, who were raped and tortured by this monster? Where was this kind, benevolent leader when he punished a priest for holding a Mass at a peace demonstration? (The censure caused the man to leave the priesthood. If only he had decided to rape children instead, he would still be a happy, productive member of the Catholic Church.) Where was his mercy for the people of sub-Saharan African where 22 million people are infected with HIV and Aids when he said condoms could make the Aids crisis worse?

In this latest scandal, Ratzinger only extended his tact for the purpose of covering up potential embarrassment. Here is a man whose strategy in the wake of these horrible revelations is to have faith in God, who helps lead one "toward the courage of not allowing oneself to be intimidated by the petty gossip of dominant opinion."

He's not sorry the rapes happened. He's sorry the priest got caught, and the Church will suffer because of it.

The "petty gossip" line reminds me of a clueless Barbara Bush saying two days before the beginning of the Iraq invasion, "Why should we hear about body bags and deaths? It's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"

Why, indeed? It's so much nicer to play dress-up and wear grand hats, while the serfs wail, pound their chests, and cry about death and child rape AKA "petty gossip" outside the gates of the bastille.

The Pope and Babs should get together for tea so they can talk about the good old days when the media didn't film the poor people's charred dead bodies, and you could touch a kid without everyone raising all kinds of hell.

But much hasn't changed since "the good ol' days". Perhaps one of the most disturbing aspects to this story (and one Douthat conveniently overlooks) is how the cops and district attorney effectively covered for the Church.

Arthur Budzinski and Gary Smith, two more victims of Father Murphy, said in an interview last week that they remember seeing Archbishop Cousins yell, and Father Murphy staring at the floor. The deaf men and their advocates were told that Father Murphy, the school's director and top fund-raiser, was too valuable to be let go, so he would be given only administrative duties.

They were outraged. They distributed "Wanted" posters with Father Murphy's face outside the cathedral in Milwaukee. They went to the police departments in Milwaukee, where they were told it was not the correct jurisdiction, and in St. Francis, where the school was located, Mr. Conway said. They also went to the office of E. Michael McCann, the district attorney of Milwaukee County, and spoke with his assistant, William Gardner.

"A criminal priest was an oxymoron to them," Mr. Conway said. "They said they'll refer it to the archdiocese."
This kind of unearned deference is precisely why the Church continues its tradition of rape, torture, and corruption.

The Vatican's foundation — much like Wall Street's — is rotten. That's bad enough, but it's delusional to then expect the corrupt to effectively regulate themselves, and to — pretty please — not trade those nasty derivatives that make your crew billions of dollars, or not cover up for those pedo priests even though exposing them may incriminate the Pope and bring down your entire fantastical playhouse. And the apologists sweeping up behind this wretched pack are really pathetic.

Douthat dives right into option "B":

For those of us who admire the pope, either possibility is distressing, but neither should come as a great surprise. The lesson of the American experience, now exhaustively documented, is that almost everyone was complicit in the scandal. From diocese to diocese, the same cover-ups and gross errors of judgment repeated themselves regardless of who found themselves in charge.
So says the man who breathlessly tried to frame the child rape accusations as an Irish thang.

I suspect it isn't a coincidence that the worst of the priest-abuse scandals have been concentrated in Ireland and America — and indeed, in Boston, the most Irish of American cities — rather than, say, in Italy or Poland or Latin America or Asia. There will always be priests who become predators; the question is how the Church as an institution deals with it. It hasn't been handled all that well anywhere, I'm afraid. But the particular qualities of Irish Catholicism — qualities which were once a source of immense vitality — seem to have led to a particularly horrifying outcome.
Erm, but…yes. Now that it's clear priests have been kiddie-diddling internationally for decades, the abuse has always been extremely unsurprising and exhaustively documented, and Douthat is very, very savvy, and Very Serious.

As part of the enthralling apex of his Vatican Apologist manifesto, Douthat repeats the mainstream's favorite narrative tactic: equally blaming conservatives and liberals — splitting the difference in a noble quest to explain nothing and confuse everyone. Meanwhile, the pedo priests and facilitator Pope run for cover in the bushes.

The permissive sexual culture that prevailed everywhere, seminaries included, during the silly season of the '70s deserves a share of the blame, as does that era's overemphasis on therapy. (Again and again, bishops relied on psychiatrists rather than common sense in deciding how to handle abusive clerics.) But it was the church's conservative instincts — the insistence on institutional loyalty, obedience and the absolute authority of clerics — that allowed the abuse to spread unpunished.
That's exactly right. The crimes here aren't systemic corruption and covering for child rapists. The real crime is extended therapy sessions, which is the fault of the liberals. And just to prove he's being fair here, Douthat does tack on some conservative blame. They're just too damn loyal. Brave little guys. Tear.

 
 

Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.