BishopAccountability.org
 
  Pope Must Be Honest about Abuse, Defrock Abusers

Arizona Daily Star
April 3, 2010

http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/article_9059ceaf-1541-5fa3-9026-6060f7d1f063.html

At its holiest time of the year, the Roman Catholic Church is being forced to confront not only the central mystery of the faith - life after death - but also a more worldly riddle: What did the Holy Father know, and when did he know it?

Questions about whether Pope Benedict XVI was personally involved, as he rose through the church hierarchy, in sweeping incidents of sexual abuse by parish priests under the rug have put the Vatican on the defensive. A top legal official of the Holy See even felt obliged to argue, in an interview with a Rome newspaper, that the Vatican is not legally responsible for any failure by individual bishops to handle reports of abuse - and that, in any event, Benedict as a head of state is beyond the jurisdiction of foreign court.

A spokesman said that Benedict sees the sex scandal as a "test for him and the church" and is spending Holy Week in "humility and penitence." Another official, Cardinal William Levada, took a much more aggressive approach, releasing a lengthy statement attacking newspaper stories that have sought to investigate Benedict's role. Levada, who is essentially the Vatican's chief enforcer on matters of faith, a post Benedict held for more than 20 years before becoming pope - singled out the New York Times' reporting as "deficient by any reasonable standards of fairness."

The most explosive allegation is that Benedict, in his old job, did not take action to defrock a Wisconsin priest, Lawrence Murphy, who had molested as many as 200 boys at a school for deaf children. Benedict's office halted a church trial of Murphy when it was learned that he was terminally ill. He died in 1998.

The particulars of this case, and another one when Benedict was archbishop of Munich, raise real questions about the pope's handling of abuse allegations. It was all-too-common practice for priests found to have raped or abused young boys to be quietly reassigned, and ultimately that is what happened in these instances.

The larger problem for the church, this Easter season, is not just that the man considered the Vicar of Christ is personally being scrutinized but that the sex abuse scandal has spread throughout Europe. German bishops are operating a hot line for abuse victims, Danish and Swiss bishops have launched investigations of old claims, and an Austrian cardinal has held a service for victims in which he admitted the church's guilt. Last month, Benedict rebuked Irish bishops for their handling allegations of rape.

The scandal has spread to the heart of today's church - Latin America. In Brazil, where more Roman Catholics live than in any other country, a television network aired a video that purported to show a priest in the northeast state of Alagoas having sex with an altar boy. That priest and two others have been suspended and are under investigation by police.

Here lies the real crisis for the church. European societies are aging, and the continent's churches are often practically empty at Mass. It is countries such as Brazil and Mexico, with their growing population and burgeoning economic development, that represent the future for the Vatican.

Easter is a time for Benedict, as the spiritual leader of a billion people, to meditate and reflect. Then he must act. It is time for the pope to be comprehensively honest and open about the tragic failure of the church to prevent or punish horrific sexual abuse - including his own errors - and he must credibly assure the faithful that such crimes will never be allowed to happen again. Even more urgently, molesters still serving as priests must be defrocked and reported to civilian authorities.

Eugene Robinson's e-mail address is eugenerobinson@washpost.com

 
 

Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.