By Jesse McKinley
The New York Times
April 12, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/us/12abuse.html
OAKLAND, Calif. — A San Francisco woman who says she was molested by the Oakland priest at the center of a case that has raised questions about Pope Benedict XVI's handling of sexually abusive clergy members described in vivid terms on Sunday how she was sexually abused and intimidated by her attacker.
The woman, Melinda Costello, said she had been abused for several years, beginning at age 7, as a parishioner in nearby Fremont, Calif., where the Rev. Stephen Kiesle was working at a church as a seminarian in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
 |
| The Rev. James J. Scahill after Mass with Jean Montana. “I think it's very brave,” Ms. Montana said of the sermon Father Scahill gave criticizing the church's response to abusive priests. Photo by Michele McDonald |
Ms. Costello, now 48 and on disability because of arthritis, says that Mr. Kiesle — who was ordained as a priest in 1972 — first playfully invited her to sit on his lap, part of a youthful demeanor that he fostered, she said, including wearing purple tennis shoes in church.
"He was considered to be the Pied Piper," Ms. Costello recalled in an interview. "He was a kid. And who doesn't like a big kid?"
But Ms. Costello says Father Kiesle's touching and tickling soon progressed to fondling her chest and genitals. "He told me the devil was inside me," she said, adding that the priest sometimes cast his actions as an exorcism. "I always knew that I was uncomfortable and that it wasn't right."
Her account came on the same day a priest in Massachusetts used his sermon to condemn the church's handling of the broader sexual abuse scandal, describing some in the clergy as "felons" and suggesting that Benedict resign.
"We must personally and collectively declare that we very much doubt the veracity of the pope and those of church authority who are defending him or even falling on the sword on his behalf," said the priest, the Rev. James J. Scahill of St. Michael's Parish in East Longmeadow.
"It is beginning to become evident that for decades, if not centuries, church leadership covered up the abuse of children and minors to protect its institutional image and the image of priesthood."
Nearly a decade after the abuse described by Ms. Costello, Father Kiesle was convicted in 1978 of tying up and molesting two boys in another California church rectory. But he was not defrocked until 1987 — despite concerns voiced to the Vatican over several years by Bishop John S. Cummins of Oakland.
Mr. Kiesle, who could not be reached for comment, served three years of probation for his 1978 conviction and underwent treatment. In 2004, he was convicted of a second sex offense — molesting a girl in 1995 in Truckee, Calif. — and sentenced to six years in prison.
He now lives in Walnut Creek, Calif., where he is registered as a sex offender.
Questions about the slow pace by which Father Kiesle was removed from the clergy have intensified since it was learned that Benedict — then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and a top Vatican official — had signed a 1985 letter telling Bishop Cummins that Father Kiesle's case needed more time and that the "good of the universal church" should be considered in coming to a decision.
A Vatican lawyer has defended the church's handling of Father Kiesle's case, saying that it had acted "expeditiously" by its own standards and that the onus was on Bishop Cummins to make sure the priest did not abuse again.
The handling of the sexual abuse problems by the church — and the future pope — has caused deep rifts.
From his pulpit on Sunday, Father Scahill, a vociferous and frequent critic of the church's handling of the sexual abuse crisis, delivered a scathing sermon in which he said, "There surely is solid ground here for severe doubt" about what the Vatican says it knew about the sexual abuse.
"And if by any slimmest of chance the pope and all his bishops didn't know — they all should resign on the basis of sheer and complete ignorance, incompetence and irresponsibility," Father Scahill said.
For the last eight years, Father Scahill, 63, has criticized how the church and the Diocese of Springfield, where his church is located, have handled the sexual abuse crisis. His criticism began, he said in an interview after his sermon, after parishioners came to him in 2002, distraught about the crisis that was shaking the Archdiocese of Boston and the Diocese of Springfield.
"They said something has to be done, shepherd our concerns," Father Scahill said. "That's what priests are supposed to do, be a shepherd.
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.