BishopAccountability.org
 
  The Church Adrift

By Paul Kennedy
New York Times
April 13, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/opinion/14iht-edkennedy.html

On Good Friday 1613, the English poet John Donne (then dean of St. Paul's, London, but probably still a Catholic) was dispatched to the west of England on an official mission. As he rode toward the setting sun, he realized with dismay that he was riding with his back to Jerusalem, farther away from the place of the crucifixion and death of Christ. In remorse, he penned one of his most beautiful, famous and difficult poems: "Good Friday, 1613. Riding Westward."

On the afternoon of Good Friday 2010, I attended the solemn 3 p.m. service at the Catholic chaplaincy of Cambridge University, and then walked westward, to a little cottage on the city's fringes. And my mind was deeply troubled by an apprehension that today's Catholic leadership is somehow also going in the wrong direction, is adrift, and appears completely unable to handle the international crisis of the many charges of sexual abuse made against an earlier generation of priests and of their superiors.

The church, my loyal pew-mates will assure me, will survive this crisis as it has survived many greater ones over the past two thousand years, and I suppose they are right. But does it have to "survive" so ineptly? I think not.

To my mind, the present crisis needs a much more decisive proclamation about where the Church stands on this very troubling issue. This should not be a proclamation to the bloodhounds of the media. It should not hold a press conference. It should not make stupid comparisons with anti-Semitism. All that will disappoint Catholics waiting for a better reply.

Of what should that proclamation consist? It surely doesn't need a rocket scientist to figure out a logic chain. The pronunciation might consist of four interconnected parts.

The first is the strongest possible affirmation of the doctrine of the sheer evil of the abuse of power and trust, especially the abusing of the defenseless and the young. On this Christ himself seems to have been the most adamant. He could forgive the woman taken in adultery. He could forgive Mary Magdalene for her prostitution. He could forgive the thief on the cross. Indeed he seems to have forgiven all sorts of folks.

But not those who abused the young. The translation in King James Bible (Luke, Chapter 17) seems as good as any. It will be "impossible" for members of the Church, being human, to avoid future offences, he told his disciples. "But woe unto him through whom they come! It were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones."

This seems to me a much more serious matter than many of those that the Church pays excess attention to.

The second is to remind all clergy that sexual abuse is not only a mortal sin but also a major transgression of criminal law. The perpetrator is liable for trial and punishment by the secular courts of any civilized society.

If a member of the clergy steals or cheats — or whatever else is forbidden in civil law — then that person should go to trial. There should be no dodgy transfers to offices outside the diocese.

The third is to articulate a sensible and just way of dealing with the superiors of the abusers. This is easier said than done, and it is probably worthwhile to make several distinctions.

If a Church superior really knew (or had the heaviest suspicions) that a member of his clergy had been abusive but sought to cover it up, then that superior is complicit both in the moral/religious and in the civil-law sense. What the civil system will do is up to the civil system itself. But the superior himself should certainly be moved on: There is many a Benedictine abbey with a spare cell for those who wish to reflect on the problems of good and evil, and many a foreign mission or medical station that could take a "worker priest," stripped of hierarchical privileges, and now devoted to following the path of St. Vincent de Paul or Mother Teresa.

 
 

Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.