BishopAccountability.org
	Dissolve Legion, Clergy Sex Abuse Victims Say SNAP April 14, 2010 http://www.snapnetwork.org/snap_statements/2010_statements/041310_dissolve_legion_clergy_sex_abuse_victims_say.htm Statement by Peter Isely, Midwest Director of SNAP, Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (414-429-7259) The Catholic hierarchy is one of the world’s most insular, secretive and unhealthy structures. And among Catholic institutions, the Legion is perhaps the most insular, secretive and unhealthy. It should be dissolved, not temporarily overseen by a Vatican-picked priest, especially not one from within the Legion’s ranks. It’s incredibly naive to assume that some in the Legion’s management structure were unaware of Maciel’s widespread and long-standing misdeeds – both sexual and financial. And it’s incredibly naive to assume that one priest, any priest, can bring sorely-needed reform to an institution founded by and led for decades by a criminal. This notion – of a “commissioner” to temporarily head this troubled organization – comes less than 24 hours after another shocking disclosure of corruption in the highest echelons of the Legion by veteran reporter Jason Berry that bears reading: http://ncronline.org/news/accountability/how-fr-maciel-built-his-empire (SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, is the world’s oldest and largest support group for clergy abuse victims. We’ve been around for 22 years and have more than 9,000 members across the country. Despite the word “priest” in our title, we have members who were molested by religious figures of all denominations, including nuns, rabbis, bishops, and Protestant ministers. Our website is SNAPnetwork.org) Contact David Clohessy (314-566-9790 cell, 314-645-5915 home), Barbara Blaine (312-399-4747), Peter Isely (414-429-7259), Barbara Dorris (314-862-7688 home, 314-503-0003 cell) http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/commissioner-seen-likely-outcome-legionary-investigation Commissioner seen as likely outcome of Legionary investigation Apr. 13, 2010 - NCR Today - By JOHN L. ALLEN JR. - Rome As a Vatican-sponsored investigation of the Legionaries of Christ reaches its end-game, the leading hypothesis in Rome appears to be that Pope Benedict XVI may appoint a special “commissioner” to lead the order through a period a reform. The appointment would, in effect, amount to a compromise between total suppression of the Legionaries, as some of the order’s fiercest critics have suggested, and a papal “certificate of good conduct,” as some of its Vatican backers had initially hoped. While it’s not clear what might happen with the order’s current leadership team under this scenario, an April 13 piece in Corriere della Sera suggested that a commissioner would have “full powers” to make decisions in the name of the pope. Though it’s considered likely that Benedict XVI would tap someone from outside the Legionaries, others have suggested that a commissioner could be named from among those Legionaries not tainted by the scandals surrounding the founder, Fr. Marcial Maciel Degollado. Maciel died in January 2008, after being ordered by the Vatican to live a life of “prayer and penance” in 2006. In addition to charges that he sexually abused minor seminarians, the Legionaries have also acknowledged that Maciel had a “prolonged and stable relationship” with a woman, who bore him a child, and that two other individuals have come forward saying they are Maciel’s children from another woman. The Legionaries claim almost 800 priests and 1,300 seminarians in 22 countries. Regnum Christi has a total membership of some 70,000. Corriere suggested the likely profile for a special commissioner would be a cardinal who does not currently hold a senior post, but who’s under the age of 80 and therefore still an elector for the next pope. That could point to someone like Portuguese Cardinal Jose Saraiva Martins, 78, who stepped down in 2008 as prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, and who as a Claretian has a background in religious life. The desire to find someone outside the order to implement a reform program is driven in part by the fact that the current leaders of the Legionaries, general director Fr. Alvaro Corcuera and vicar general Fr. Luis Garza, were longtime aides of Maciel. Though both men have denied knowledge of Maciel’s misdeeds, critics say it strains credibility to believe that no one within Maciel’s inner circle was aware of his “double life.” In late March, veteran Italian Catholic writer Sandro Magister referred to the current leadership team of the Legionaries as a “nomenklatura that must disappear,” arguing that real renewal is “impossible as long as they remain in power.” In addition to the pope, at least three senior Vatican officials will play a role in deciding the fate of the Legionaries: Italian Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, the Secretary of State, who is currently travelling in Chile; American Cardinal William Levada, prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith; and Slovenian Cardinal Franc Rode, prefect of the Congregation for Religious. Rode in particular is seen as supportive of the Legionaries and their lay branch Regnum Christi, and at an earlier stage in the process had spoken privately of hoping to issue a “certificate of good conduct” to the order and its current leadership. In general, Vatican personnel sometimes find themselves struggling to reconcile two instincts with regard to the Legionaries. On the one hand, many believe that most Legionaries and Regnum Christi members are decent, faithful people, suggesting there’s something positive about the order worth preserving. Yet Vatican personnel also realize that especially given the events of the last month, their handling of the Legionaries will be seen as emblematic for the church’s broader response to the sexual abuse crisis. How Benedict XVI balances those instincts will, therefore, be among the more closely watched judgment calls of his pontificate. Vatican sources say a decision could come shortly after the pope’s April 17-18 outing to Malta.
Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.