BishopAccountability.org
 
 

Ridsdale’s Release (or: Mates Are Mates)

By Lewis Blayse
lewisblayse.net
June 2, 2013

http://lewisblayse.net/2013/06/02/ridsdales-release-or-mates-are-mates/

Image above: With apologies to Tandberg

Gerald Ridsdale, Australia’s worst clerical child sexual abuser, is eligible for parole from Ararat Prison (pictured below) later this month. Victoria’s Adult Parole Board chair, Elizabeth Curtain, and her board, will decide if he is to be freed. It would be expected that she would turn down Ridsdale’s parole application, but this cannot be guaranteed. Since the process is not transparent, however, we will not know the reasons for her board’s decision.

Image: Ararat Prison, in which Gerald Risdale is currently incarcerated

The Catholic Church’s insiders rag, CathNews, reports that Ridsdale “helps counsel and care for other paedophiles in Ararat Prison.” Apparently this will help with his parole bid. They further note that he “attends mass every Friday and organizes an annual Christmas dinner.” What further proof of rehabilitation could the CathNews require?

Image: George Pell giving support to Gerald Risdalde in 1993

When it was rumoured that George Pell was to be appointed to lead investigations into cleaning up the Catholic Church in Ireland, there was great public protest in Ireland. This was directly related to Pell’s association with Ridsdale, including being a house-mate (see image below for a picture of Risdale from about the time he was sharing a house with George Pell) and supporting him at his 1993 trial (see photo above).

Image: Gerald Risdale circa 1970s

CathNews typically prints this photo of Pell and Risdale with Pell removed from it. Irish victims’ group Child Aware, headed by Hanora Brennan, wrote to every member of the Dail (Parliament) to protest against Cardinal Pell having any role in the plan, but fortunately, his appointment did not come to pass.

Following Ridsdale’s 1994 conviction, Judge White said the Catholic Church had moved Ridsdale from parish to parish and had shown inadequate compassion to his victims. “The Catholic Church cannot escape criticism in view of the lack of action on complaints being made as to your conduct.” He said the church’s “constant moving of you from parish to parish” provided more opportunity for Ridsdale’s “predatory conduct”.

In sentencing, Judge White described Ridsdale’s actions as “evil hypocrisy”. “By virtue of your privileged position, you had considerable control and power over the children and you used the blind trust of these Catholic families, in your capacity as the parish priest, to enable you to have private time with your victims and engage in your degrading conduct.”

“These crimes are extremely serious … having regard to your position of trust, the attitude of Catholic families at the time of placing priests on pedestals, the power you were able to exercise over those families and their children, and your vocation as a priest, there is no doubt your conduct plummets to the depths of evil hypocrisy,” Judge White said.

Ridsdale has some insider legal supporters. The Court of Appeal in 1995 described Ridsdale’s sentence as “unusually long”, which points to sympathy for early parole. It also noted that, given his age (70), it was “harsh punishment and a severe burden.”

When new charges were being formulated in 2004, the then Director of Public Prosecutions, Paul Coghlan, did not want to proceed with the charges against Ridsdale, because “it was not in the public interest.” He also claimed that it would be unlikely that Ridsdale would receive an increased sentence (but he did). His spokesperson said, “We are prosecuting all of these cases in the context of limited resources in the criminal justice system. The question becomes ‘what’s to be gained for the public?’”

Eventually, Coghlan, responding to what he called “disquiet in the community,” allowed the charges to proceed, and Ridsdale was duly convicted and sentenced to a further term of imprisonment.

Victorian police have indicated that Ridsdale, again, may face further charges if he is paroled this month. There may, again, be a need for further “disquiet in the community.”

[Postscript: Pell says he accompanied Ridsdale into court in 1993 on the basis of “pastoral care.” It remains to be seen if he will extend the same pastoral care in greeting Ridsdale if he is released from Ararat Prison.]

 

 

 

 

 




.

 
 

Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.