BishopAccountability.org
 
 

Hobart Archbishop Says Scale of Abuse by Catholic Clergy "Difficult" to Understand

By Christopher Knaus
The Guardian
February 20, 2017

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/feb/21/hobart-archbishop-says-scale-of-abuse-by-catholic-clergy-difficult-to-understand

The Catholic Archbishop of Hobart, Julian Porteous, told the abuse inquiry on Tuesday that he struggles ‘to understand why [abuse] was so widespread, why there were so many priest perpetrators’. Photograph: Archdiocese Of Hobart

The archbishop of Hobart said he still struggles to understand why Catholic clergy abused children on such a massive scale, and blamed the church’s response on an ignorance of “the seriousness of child sexual abuse”.

The royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse on Tuesday heard evidence from a panel of archbishops and bishops, largely from Australia’s smaller Catholic dioceses.

The commissioners are seeking to understand why one in 14 Catholic clergy allegedly abused children in Australia, and are scrutinising the church’s efforts to reform its child protection.

The archbishop, Julian Porteous, was asked to give his thoughts on why the abuse crisis occurred at such a significant scale in the Catholic church. He was unable to give the royal commission a clear answer, saying he found it “very difficult” to understand.

“I struggle to understand why it was so widespread, why there were so many priest perpetrators,” Porteous said.

The royal commission has heard significant evidence that the culture, structure and governance of the church contributed to the abuse, as did vows of celibacy and priest training.

Porteous said he believed the responsibility and fault lay with the individuals who perpetrated abuse and individuals who failed to respond properly, although he later described failings in church culture and agreed there had been a massive failure in leadership.

The archbishop of Canberra and Goulburn, Christopher Prowse, gave evidence that he wanted to be more open to survivors and the community on the issue of abuse, and wanted to “walk with victims” in their healing process.

That prompted the counsel assisting, Gail Furness, SC, to ask Prowse why he had chosen not to attend the only healing ceremony held for survivors of abuse at Marist College Canberra, held in November. “It was a very recent mistake and somewhat at odds with the evidence you have given,” Furness said.

Prowse conceded it had been a mistake not to attend and repeated an apology he made after his absence caused outrage among the survivors.

The hearing continues on Tuesday and is expected to hear from the bishops of Darwin, Parramatta, Broome and the Maronite diocese.

Since you’re here …

… we’ve got a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever, but far fewer are paying for it. Advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian has only one shareholder, The Scott Trust, which keeps our independent, investigative, public-interest journalism free from commercial or political interference. Our journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to pay for it, our future would be much more secure.

 

 

 

 

 




.

 
 

Any original material on these pages is copyright © BishopAccountability.org 2004. Reproduce freely with attribution.