NY Times talks to men who got settlements after alleged abuse by cardinal
Catholic News Service via Crux
July 16, 2018
|Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick, retired archbishop of Washington, is pictured in a 2017 photo.|
Photo by Bob Roller
NEW YORK - A front-page New York Times article published July 16 detailed the alleged abuse of two seminarians in the Diocese of Metuchen, New Jersey by then-Bishop Theodore E. McCarrick in the 1980s that resulted in settlements to each man.
For one of the seminarians, the alleged abuse continued after he had been ordained to the priesthood.
The 3,100-word article, written by Laurie Goodstein and Sharon Otterman, said the bishop would invite seminarians to spend time with him on overnight trips away from their seminary, and then, in giving bedroom assignments, direct one of them to his bedroom, where there was just one bed.
The abuse of these two men, according to an interview with one of the former priests by the Times and the examination of the second man’s file by the newspaper on the condition that he - now also a former priest - not be named, took place in the 1980s, while McCarrick served as first Bishop of Metuchen and then as Archbishop of Newark, New Jersey.
Ordained a priest for the New York Archdiocese in 1958, then-Father McCarrick was ordained an auxiliary bishop of New York in 1977. He was appointed the first Bishop of Metuchen in 1981 and was named Archbishop of Newark in 1986. He was installed as Archbishop of Washington in 2001 and made a cardinal in that same year. He retired in 2006.
In a statement to The New York Times, Cardinal Joseph W. Tobin of Newark said that he was “greatly disturbed by reports” that McCarrick, his predecessor in Newark from 1986 to 2000, had “harassed seminarians and young clergy.”
“I recognize without any ambiguity that all people have a right to live, work and study in safe environments,” he wrote. “I intend to discuss this tragedy with the leadership of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in order to articulate standards that will assure high standards of respect by bishops, priests and deacons for all adults.”
McCarrick, now 88, said in a June 20 statement that he would no longer exercise any public ministry “in obedience” to the Vatican after an allegation he abused a teenager in 1971 when he was serving as a priest of the Archdiocese of New York was found “credible and substantiated.”
The cardinal said he was shocked and saddened by the report but said he had no recollection of that episode of abuse. He declined comment to the Times, and refused to be interviewed for the new story.
The Washington Archdiocese said in a statement on the matter that “the Holy See … has exclusive authority in the oversight of a cardinal” and referred the matter to the New York Archdiocese.
New York Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan, also in a June 20 statement, said the allegation was turned over to law enforcement officials, and was then thoroughly investigated by an independent forensic agency, as per the “Charter for the Protection of Children and Young People” first approved by the U.S. bishops in 2002. “The Holy See was alerted as well, and encouraged us to continue the process,” he added.
The Archdiocese of New York “renews its apology to all victims abused by priests,” he added.
In the July 16 Times story, Robert Ciolek, 57, cited about a dozen trips out of town with then-Bishop McCarrick, including a beach house purchased by the diocese in Sea Girt, New Jersey, a fishing camp in Eldred, New York, a small apartment on an upper floor of a hospital the prelate used for overnight stays in New York City, and one trip to Puerto Rico.
Ciolek told the paper he felt unable to say no, in part because he had been sexually abused by a teacher in his Catholic high school - information he had shared with McCarrick. “I trusted him, I confided in him, I admired him,” he added. “I couldn’t imagine that he would have anything other than my best interests in mind.”
The touching started with the bishop asking Ciolek to rub his shoulders, and then led to other, unwanted touching. But Ciolek said that touching always stayed above the waist and avoided the genitals. He added there was no kissing or holding of hands.
Ciolek left the priesthood in 1988 to marry. Around 1999, he was called in by Msgr. Michael J. Alliegro, who had been McCarrick’s secretary in Metuchen. The monsignor, according to the Times, knew about the trips with seminarians and the bed-sharing. He asked Ciolek if he planned to sue the diocese. “And I literally laughed, and I said, no,” Ciolek told the newspaper, adding Alliegro responded with a sigh of relief.
By then, though, allegations against the prelate, now an archbishop, had been circulating for five years, according to the Times. The paper said complaints were made to American bishops, the papal nuncio in Washington and, in 2008, to Pope Benedict XVI; McCarrick had voted in the conclave that elected him three years prior.
The first complaint was written in 1994 by the second priest who received an abuse settlement.
In 1987, according to the file examined by the Times, the second former priest said the prelate took him to an Italian restaurant in New York City, and then to the small apartment above the hospital.
The Times said the archbishop asked the seminarian to change into a striped sailor shirt and a pair of shorts he had on hand, and joined him in the bed. “He put his arms around me and wrapped his legs between mine,” said the account written by the ex-priest, who was still a seminarian at that time.
“He also wrote that he once saw Archbishop McCarrick having sex with a young priest in a cabin at the Eldred fishing camp, and that the archbishop invited him to be ‘next,'” the Times said. The seminarian also received letters from the archbishop signed “Uncle Ted” or “Uncle T.”
In his 1994 letter to McCarrick’s successor in Metuchen, Bishop Edward T. Hughes, the second priest said he believed the sexual and emotional abuse he endured from McCarrick, as well as several other priests, “had left him so traumatized that it triggered him to touch two 15-year-old boys inappropriately,” the newspaper reported.
Ten years later, that priest had been forced to resign under the U.S. Church’s new zero-tolerance policy against child abuse, based on the admission in that letter.
He received a $100,000 settlement in 2006 from the Diocese of Metuchen. Ciolek received an $80,000 settlement in 2004 paid by the Archdiocese of Newark and the Dioceses of Metuchen and Trenton, according to the Times.
In June, in response to the credible allegation of abuse of a minor in 1971 made against McCarrick, the current Bishop of Metuchen, Bishop James F. Checchio, said he had his diocese’s records examined and found no similar report that the prelate had “ever abused any minor during his time here in Metuchen.”
“The abuse of a minor by a priest - as is being reported in this case from New York - is an abomination and sickens and saddens us all,” he said.
He acknowledged that allegations that he engaged in sexual behavior with adults decades ago had led to settlements in two of those allegations. “The abuse of anyone who is vulnerable is both shameful and horrific,” Checchio said.