SCOTLAND
The Observer
Catherine Deveney
The Observer, Saturday 18 May 2013
When news came last week that Cardinal Keith O’Brien was being exiled from Scotland for “prayer and penance”, memories came flooding back to Lenny, the former priest who has accused O’Brien of inappropriate behaviour.
He remembered being a young priest in the 90s and telling O’Brien, then an archbishop, that he could not pledge allegiance to him and was leaving. The cold chill of O’Brien’s disapproval followed him down the path of the archbishop’s official residence and seeped into him in the dole office where he queued for benefits.
Years later, the two were forced to meet again. O’Brien was a cardinal. Lenny reminded him of an unfortunate prank O’Brien had organised when he was spiritual director at Lenny’s seminary. Ah, the cardinal admitted, other staff had later chastised him for bad judgment. “But these days,” he smiled, “I can do what I like.”
In February, O’Brien resigned after complaints of sexual misconduct, not just from Lenny but from three serving priests in his own diocese. His statement admitted inappropriate conduct “as a priest, archbishop and cardinal”, a clear indication that his sexual choices had been a lifestyle and not isolated indiscretions. Three months on, there has been no official Vatican investigation and is no prospect of one. Some interpreted last week’s statement of O’Brien’s exile as Vatican “action”. To the four complainants, it was another smokescreen. So what has really been going on for the last three months, behind the scenes of the Catholic church?
The trigger for the four complainants going public was not, as some suggested, the resignation of Pope Benedict and the ensuing papal conclave. Their statements were with the nuncio on 8 February. Benedict resigned on the 11th. It was, instead, a message from the nuncio, via an intermediary, that the cardinal would retire to a life of “prayer and seclusion”. It was “Vatican-speak”. The complainants knew that everything was about to be swept under the clerical carpet. Last week’s statement was uncannily familiar. The cardinal would undergo “a period of prayer and penance”. But if the Vatican really wanted that, why had they not insisted on it immediately? Clearly, it wasn’t his sexual misconduct that triggered this statement. So what was it?
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.