MINNESOTA
MinnPost
[Doe 18_Opposition to the Diocese of New Ulm’s Motion to Dismiss via Jeff Anderson & Associates].
[Doe 6 and 7_Opposition to the Diocese of New Ulm’s Motion to Dismiss]
By Brian Lambert
The New Ulm Diocese can’t quite get its head around why it should release a list of problem priests. Elizabeth Baier of MPR reports: “During a hearing on Monday, officials from the Diocese of New Ulm told the judge that the list should remain secret. They moved to dismiss a nuisance claim that demands the diocese disclose the names. In a statement, diocese officials said two of the people named on the list believe the sexual abuse allegations made against them are false and their names should therefore not be made public.” And how would that play in your average criminal proceeding?
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.