Jury reasoning in joint and separate trials of institutional child sexual abuse: An empirical study
AUSTRALIA
Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse
Download: Jury reasoning in joint trials of institutional child sexual abuse: An empirical study
Professor Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Professor Annie Cossins and Natalie Martschuk
May 2016
ISBN 978-1-925289-62-6
Summary
This report forms part of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse’s research program in relation to the criminal justice system’s response to child sexual abuse in institutional contexts.
Child sex offenders are not a homogenous group and their offending behaviours vary widely. Offenders may offend against one victim or many victims, and they may engage in one incident of sexual abuse or multiple repeated incidents. The diversity and complexity of offending behaviours has a number of implications for the prosecution of child sex offenders.
The scope of this report
This study investigated the extent to which joint trials with cross-admissible tendency evidence infringed defendants’ rights,…
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed