UNITED STATES
BishopAccountability.org
This page gathers the lists of accused priests (see below) that have been released by dioceses and religious orders, since the first such list was posted by the Diocese of Tucson on June 21, 2002. Bishop Gerald F. Kicanas [3] was co-adjutor bishop at the time, and the Dallas charter’s goal of transparency was cited as the rationale for the release.
Cardinal William H. Keeler [4] released a list for the Archdiocese of Baltimore on September 25, 2002 and explained that he and the other U.S. bishops were making “an absolute commitment” to disclosure in order to earn forgiveness and rebuild trust – the church’s “crisis of trust” was brought on, he wrote, by “horrible and criminal actions, and by inaction and secrecy.”
Keeler was criticized by some for posting his list; one commentator wrote that he had “burnished his reputation by trashing the reputations of his priests.” The Baltimore list was removed from the archdiocesan website before Keeler’s retirement in 2007, and for a decade under his successors, Cardinal Edwin F. O’Brien and Archbishop William E. Lori, it was unavailable there. The archdiocese recently – apparently in late March 2016 – restored the list to their website in a supplemented version. We are preparing materials to document this new development.
In the meantime, about two dozen other dioceses and religious orders have released lists, often in compliance with the nonmonetary requirements of a settlement (see, for example, the bankruptcy reorganization plan of the Jesuits’ Oregon Province). In the few cases where a list has not been released according to the terms of an agreement, there are still pressures and considerations of various kinds. It is illuminating, for example, to compare Bishop Michael A. Saltarelli’s public letter about the original Wilmington diocesan list, as published in the diocesan newspaper, with the vicar general’s letter to an accused priest about the release. Scroll down to view our linked list of lists, or click on a diocese or religious order to hop directly to that list on the page below: …
Then, apparently in January 2016, without publicizing his action, Archbishop Lori posted the Baltimore list again, in a different format, and with 14 new names appended, providing detailed accounts of some clerics accused since Keeler’s list was released in September 2002. In April 2016, a glitch was fixed that had made it difficult to navigate from the archdiocesan homepage to the revised and reposted list.
The reposted list was publicly noticed for the first time in Baltimore archdiocese posts list of accused priests, by Alison Knezevich, Baltimore Sun (5/9/16).
The revised list has a serious flaw, still an issue as of 5/10/16. As mentioned above, each name on Cardinal Keeler’s old list was linked to a separate webpage that provided brief information about the cleric’s assignment history and allegations. It was not a convenient implementation, but the information was accessible. Archbishop Lori’s list puts the assignment and allegation information in an HTML title tag under each name. When the reader mouses over the name, the information appears in a box. But the information cannot be printed, and if the information is of any length, some of it is not even visible in the box.
In order to make Archbishop Lori’s revised list usable, we have extracted all the information from the title tags, using the HTML source code for the page, and assembled the information in viewable and printable form. We have also reformatted the information so that each assignment is bulleted.
Then we created an Excel spreadsheet with all the assignment information in sortable form, so that the list can be analyzed and understood more easily. The Excel sheet reveals that accused priests have worked in at least 94 Baltimore parishes. Many parishes were assigned numerous accused priests over the years. For example, according to the archdiocese’s own assignment information, at St. Mark’s parish in Catonsville, no fewer than 7 accused priests worked for a total of 38 person years. In total, according to Archbishop Lori’s list, accused priests and brothers worked and/or resided for 1,261 person-years in parishes, high schools, and other facilities in the archdiocese.
Note that those data and Lori’s reposted list do not include some priests and a brother known to have been accused: Deacon William Steven Albaugh, , Fr. Robert B. Cullen SJ, Fr. John Danilak (Byzantine rite), Fr. Thom Kuhl , Br. Xavier Langan FSC, Fr. Brian Keith Olkowski, and Antonio Jorge Velez-Lopez OFM Cap.
In his introduction, Lori states that “for greater context, the documents accompanying the 2002 disclosure can also be found at the links further below.” The links are not provided below, but are accessible through the archdiocesan website’s site map: Homepage > Site Map > Click “Expand All” > Under “General Information” Click Key Policies.
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.