LANSING (MI)
Michigan Advance [Lansing, MI]
May 21, 2025
By Ben Solis
Sexual assault survivors gained support from the Michigan Senate on Tuesday with the passage of bills to allow more time in filing civil lawsuits against their assailants, but it remains unclear if the Republican-controlled House plans to take up the bills.
The upper chamber voted 25-9 to pass the five-bill package sponsored by Democratic Senators Kevin Hertel of Saint Clair Shores, Sam Singh of East Lansing, Mallory McMorrow of Royal Oak, Jeff Irwin of Ann Arbor, and Veronica Klinefelt of Eastpointe.
Together, the bills would give survivors of sexual assault or other criminal sexual conduct a 10-year window after a crime was committed, with a cutoff at the age of 42, or within seven years after discovering an injury or some other connection to the misconduct, or whichever is later.
Survivors can file lawsuits to recover damages sustained from the criminal sexual conduct, which could be brought in court at any time if there was also a criminal conviction involved with the assault.
Regardless of the limitations listed in the package, the bills would allow a survivor who was victimized before the package’s effective date to file a lawsuit for damages within one year after the effective date. In that case, a claimant could not recover more than $1.5 million.
Other bills in the package would remove the existing 10-year statute of limitations, exempt claims to recover damages for criminal sexual conduct from the existing permanent prohibition on bringing a claim against the state, and would amend the state’s government immunity law in various ways – including removing the immunity from tort liability for a public university, college or school district whose employee engaged in the misconduct while working there if the institution was negligent in hiring, supervising or training that employee.
The same is true if the institution knew about the abuse and failed to intervene.
In a statement, Hertel said survivors of sexual assault have for too long been denied their day in court and silenced by “arbitrary deadlines and a system that failed them.”
“No more,” Hertel said regarding the Justice for Survivors package. “At their core, these bills are about justice, accountability, and finally giving survivors the voice they deserve. With this legislation, we are shattering that silence and making it clear: Michigan will no longer be a place where assault is ignored and abusers get to walk free to continue their cycle of harm.”
Michigan over the last several years made national headlines due to high-profile sexual assault or abuse cases, including the abuse perpetrated by the Larry Nassar scandal at Michigan State University and Robert Anderson at the University of Michigan. Attorney General Dana Nessel also spearheaded investigations into the Catholic Church and the Boy Scouts of American in Michigan during her tenure, which exposed abuses across generations.
McMorrow said in a statement that Michigan’s justice system needed to be reformed to a position of protecting survivors and not shielding abusers.
“With the passage of this legislation out of the Senate, we’re one step closer to securing the access to justice that survivors deserve,” McMorrow said.
Irwin in a statement touted the legislation’s removal of immunity for large institutions to empower survivors “to speak their truth and pursue justice that they deserve.”
Klinefelt in a statement also noted that power institutions have shielded perpetrators while abuses happened under their watch. The bills would no longer allow those institutions to hide behind legal immunity when survivors come forward.
“We’re ending that with this legislation and are restoring trust, delivering justice, and making sure survivors’ voices are not easily swept under the rug.”
The bills now move to the House, but it’s unclear if they’ll get traction in the Republican-controlled chamber.
In a Tuesday news briefing, Michigan House Speaker Matt Hall (R-Richland Township) appeared noncommittal on taking the bills up in the House. He also noted that his Democratic colleagues tried to pass similar legislation last session, but the effort died in a disastrous lame duck session that saw several key Democratic priorities grind to a halt.
“I haven’t looked at it, but I think the idea of extending statutes of limitations for decades, or whatever it is, that creates a lot of questions, a lot of legal problems,” Hall said. “We’ll look at it. I haven’t seen it, but you didn’t see the Democrats move it when they were there, so it must have a lot of problems.”