UNITED STATES
Dallas Morning News
By Rudolph Bush
rbush@dallasnews.com
The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child issued a stinging report Wednesday that first and foremost called on the Roman Catholic Church to remove all child abusers from its ranks and to open its archives to the committee for independent review of crimes and concealment.
The report went beyond that though to criticize the Church for its stance on abortion, homosexuality and contraception among other things.
The Vatican responded that certain elements of the report were “an attempt to interfere with Catholic Church teaching on the dignity of human person and in the exercise of religious freedom. ”
The Catholic Association issued a statement calling the report “a stunning and misguided attackon the Vatican. The responsible committee appears to have overlooked the last decade, in which the Church has taken serious measures to protect children.”
In simple terms, should the committee have limited its comment to the issue of child sexual abuse or was it right to raise broader questions about the church’s teachings on social issues? In a broader sense, what is illuminated by this conflict between a secular institution and a religious one? How should a person of faith respond when someone or something questions their sacred teachings?
WILLIAM LAWRENCE, Dean and Professor of American Church History, Perkins School of Theology, Southern Methodist University
The assurance in the Constitution that no laws can “prohibit the free exercise” of religion should not be confused with a religious organization’s immunity from criticism. And when the criticism comes from an international body with no capacity to institute penalties or inflict punishment on the religious body, the critique should not be confused with a threat. But it still deserves to be taken seriously.
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.