UNITED STATES
Waiting for Godot to Leave
Kevin O’Brien
An anonymous commenter responded to my post here, with at least one question that I answered here. And yet he or she claims I’m dodging the points he or she has made.
So let me address them below:
1. Anonymous claimed that the sexual scandal in the Church is over. This was the point I responded to in my follow up post: It most emphatically is not. Bishops are still enabling sex abuse, and getting indignant when the press or the courts point this out.
2. Anonymous takes issue with the number of pedophile priests that are or have been active in the Church (reports range from 4 to 10%). But the number of abusers is not the point. The point is how the bishops continue to enable such abuse. Even if the number is half what Pope Francis suggests – i.e., only 1% – the point is not that number. The point is what should be done once a crime against a child is committed. This is what can easily be fixed, and this is what the bishops in their “knavish imbecility” continue to avoid fixing.
3. Anonymous is playing around with numbers from the John Jay Report. He or she seems to think that the only relevant number is the number of priests convicted of abuse in the court system. No one in the Church, not even the most untrustworthy bishop, would ever suggest that the number of priests who are criminally charged, much less convicted, is anything but the tiniest fraction of the number of priests who have actually abused children.
4. Anonymous seems to think I am claiming that the problem is more prevalent now than it was in the 1970’s. It’s certainly not as bad as it was then, and I don’t know how he or she got the idea I was claiming that it is.
5. Anonymous argues that SNAP is not a reliable source for information about the abuse crisis. SNAP certainly has a vested interest in this issue, but if Anonymous thinks they’re lying or fudging when it comes to the evidence, such as the documentary evidence released by dioceses, law firms and courts all over the country and readily available on the internet, he or she should compare the original source documents with what SNAP claims. Don’t believe SNAP? Don’t believe the New York Times or bishopaccountability.org? Fine. Check out the Graves Report in Kansas City, the source documents in St. Paul, the documents regarding the St. Louis cases, etc. Do a little Googling and you’ll find them. You don’t need a filter any more; you don’t need a middle man. This is the internet. Go straight to the source and find the truth. I have, and it’s very disturbing.
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.