CALIFORNIA
Leagle
SANTILLAN v. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FRESNO
GEORGE SANTILLAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FRESNO, Defendant and Appellant.
No. B221409.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.
Filed February 1, 2012.
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
GOOD CAUSE appearing, the opinion filed January 6, 2012, in the above entitled matter is hereby modified as follows:
1. On page 10, line 11 of the text, delete “as that term is defined in section 340.1, subdivision (b)(2)” so that the sentence ends after “sexual conduct.”
2. On page 10, footnote 4, delete the text of the footnote and replace it with the following sentence: “The Doe court held that the term `unlawful sexual conduct’ refers to the acts specified in section 340.1, subdivision (e), which defines “[c]hildhood sexual abuse’ in terms of seven provisions of the Penal Code describing various prohibited sexual acts against minors. (Doe, supra, 42 Cal.4th at pp. 545-546.)”
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.