ITALIA
Il Secolo XIX
Genova – Un esposto di trentatre pagine che chiama in causa l’arcivescovo di Genova, Angelo Bagnasco, e i suoi due predecessori, Tarcisio Bertone e Dionigi Tettamanzi. Lo ha presentato in Procura Francesco Zanardi, portavoce della rete “L’abuso”, sul caso di don Riccardo Seppia, l’ex parroco di Sestri Ponente arrestato e condannato a nove anni e mezzo per violenza sessuale su minore, tentata induzione alla prostituzione minorile e offerte di droga. Zanardi chiede alla Procura di verificare se i tre arcivescovi fossero a conoscenza dei comportamenti del parroco e, nel caso, perché non abbiano fatto nulla per evitarli.
«Anche se nelle linee guida sugli abusi sessuali dei preti sui minori la Conferenza episcopale italiana ha stabilito che per i vescovi non ci sarà obbligo di denuncia in quanto non sono pubblici ufficiali – dice Zanardi – deve pur valere l’articolo 40 del codice penale dove si dice che non impedire un reato di cui si è a conoscenza equivale a cagionarlo».
[translation]
Case of Seppia, Zanardi denounces three bishops
Genoa- A letter of 33 pages accuses the archbishop of Genova, Angelo Bagnasco, and his two predecessors, Tarcisio Bertone and Dionigi Tettamanzi. It was presented to the office of the Prosecutor by Francesco Zanardi, spokesperson of the network L’abuso”, in connection to the case of don Riccardo Seppia, the former parish priest of Sestri Ponenete, who was arrested and sentenced to nine years and six months for sexual violence on minor, attempted prostitution of minors and multiple offers of drugs. Zanardi asks the Prosecutor to investigate whether the three archbishops knew about the behavior of the priest, and if sdo, why they did not do anything to avoid this behavior.
“Even if the “guidelines on sexual abuse of minors by clergy” of the Italian Conference of Bishops has stated that there will be no obligation to denounce, because bishops are not public officials, ” says Zanardi, “the article 40 of the Criminal Law should still be applied, which states that a person who has knowledge of a crime, but does nothing to stop it, is equally responsible of causing it.”
According to Zanardi, who has been fighting for years, trying to expose sexual abuse by clergy in the Savona Diocese, it is legitimate to suppose that the bishops of Genova were fully aware of the perversities of Riccardo Seppia, through the notes in the personnel file of the priest”. In our letter we ask the the Prosecutor to investigate the visit of cardinal Bagnasco paid to Riccardo Seppia, when he was in jail. “Why did he obtain permission to visit him when the judge had forbidden all visits?”
Judge Roberta Bossi, in the meantime, has turned down the request of Paola Bonanni, the lawyer of the ex-priest, to have the priest serve his sentence in a therapeutic community, because the priest is ill and needs to be taken care of. Don Seppia will remain hereto in the “secure” area of the prison of Sanremo, where sexual delinquents are held.
Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.