Cultures of cover-up

The Economist

Erasmus

IN MANY international organisations (including the European Union), there are internal tensions caused by different attitudes towards truth-telling. At the risk of dealing in huge stereotypes, it’s a commonplace of social anthropology that there are some cultures and sub-cultures that attach high importance to truth-telling and regard telling direct lies as shameful; and others which foster a keen sense of the importance of “saving face” (one’s own, or the family’s, or the organisation’s) and feel it’s okay to tell fibs to keep up appearances. Within both Europe and the United States (again, sorry for the stereotype), the latter mindset seems more prevalent in southern regions than northern ones.

A similar cultural fault-line apparently runs through the global Catholic church, and it has affected the response to child abuse allegations. That at least is the implication of some public testimony that Australia’s top Catholic cleric has just given, before heading off to Rome to take on a job that will include responsibility for the Vatican’s murky finances.

Cardinal George Pell (pictured) told a Royal Commission on child abuse that despite its failings, the English-speaking Catholic world had been ahead of the Vatican in facing up to the fact that terrible abuses had taken place. When such allegations surfaced in the mid-1990s…

…The attitude of some people at the Vatican was that if accusations were being made against priests, they were being made exclusively or at least predominantly by enemies of the church to make trouble and therefore they should be dealt with sceptically. I think there was more of an inclination to give the benefit of the doubt to the defendant rather than listen seriously to the complaints…I think in many ways, the English-speaking world made a significant contribution to the universal church in this area.

It wasn’t this part of Cardinal Pell’s testimony that grabbed headlines. People were more interested in what he had to say about a specific matter: a former altar boy and sex abuse victim who lost a battle in Australia’s court of appeal after it was decreed that the Catholic church was not an entity that could be sued. In his testimony, Cardinal Pell acknowledged that although the church had fought a hard and technically correct legal battle in the case, Mr Ellis had been treated unfairly from a Christian perspective. “From my point of view, from a Christian point of view, leaving aside the legal dimension, I don’t think we did deal fairly.”

Note: This is an Abuse Tracker excerpt. Click the title to view the full text of the original article. If the original article is no longer available, see our News Archive.