[For a complete list of accused bishops, click here.]
Cardinal Marc Ouellet, P.S.S.
Archbishop of Québec, 2002-2010; President, Pontifical Commission for Latin America, 2010-2023; Prefect, Dicastery for Bishops, 2010-2023. His resignation as prefect for the Dicastery for Bishops was announced 1/30/2023 and took effect 4/12/2023. Ouellet was 78.
Summary: A former pastoral worker’s allegations against Cardinal Ouellet were made public in a class action lawsuit filed against the Quebec archdiocese in August 2022. Another woman’s alleged sexual abuse by Ouellet was reported by a French publication in January 2023. Before the cases became public, each woman had reported her abuse to the Church, and Pope Francis had decided that a full canonical investigation was not warranted in either case. In March 2026, at a civil trial to determine if the former pastoral worker had defamed Ouellet, two other women testified to inappropriate touching by Oeullet. On 8/31/2026, the Quebec Superior Court published the judge’s ruling in Ouellet’s civil defamation case against Pamela Groleau, the pastoral worker whose allegations were made public in August 2022. The judge ruled in favor of Ouellet, stating that Groleau had falsely accused him “recklessly and even maliciously.” The judge ordered Groleau to pay Ouellet the full amount — $100,000 Canadian dollars — he sought.
Background: Ouellet was first accused publicly on 8/16/2022, when a law firm representing 101 clergy sex abuse victims published its court-filed application for class action against the Québec archdiocese. The cardinal’s alleged abuses were detailed in the complaint, and his name also appeared in the list of 88 accused Québec clerics and other archdiocesan personnel that was appended to the document. According to the filing, Ouellet subjected a young woman to “touching of a non-consensual sexual nature,” including massaging her shoulders “forcefully,” kissing her, and sliding his hands down her back to her buttocks. The alleged misconduct occurred three times from August 2008 to February 2010, when Ouellet was Québec archbishop and the alleged victim, called “F” in the law firm’s documents, was a pastoral intern, ages 23-25. The young woman had reported the incidents without naming Ouellet to the Québec archdiocese’s Committee for the Sexual Abuse of Minors and Vulnerable Persons in November 2020. At the committee chair’s request, she detailed her allegations, naming Ouellet, in a letter to Pope Francis dated January 26, 2021. In February 2021, F was contacted by Rev. Jacques Servais, S.J., who said that the Pope had asked him to investigate her allegation. Servais is an associate of Ouellet: he directs Casa Balthasar, a house of formation in Rome run by the Lubac-Balthasar-Speyr Association, for which Ouellet sits on the board. Servais interviewed F virtually on March 4, 2021.
F didn’t learn of the outcome of her case until 18 months later. On 8/18/2022, two days after the law firm published its class action complaint and list of alleged aggressors, the Vatican stated that the Pope had found “insufficient elements to open a canonical investigation” of F’s allegations. The next day, Ouellet publicly denied F’s allegations, calling them “false” and “defamatory.” On 12/13/2022, Ouellet announced that he had filed a lawsuit against F in the District of Montreal superior court, alleging defamation. He sought 100,000 Canadian dollars (around $74,000 in US dollars) in compensatory damages, and said that if he won his case, he would donate the award to fight sexual abuse of Canada’s indigenous people.
On 1/13/2023, F publicly identified herself to a group of reporters as Pamela Groleau. In a written statement, Groleau said she had faced “threats” and “intimidation” from the Church. Her statement did not mention Ouellet.
On 1/18/2023, a France-based Catholic weekly, Golias Hebdo, revealed the existence of a prior complaint against Ouellet from another woman. [See also National Catholic Reporter’s article.] In August 2020, three months before the Québec archdiocese first heard from Groleau, Québec archbishop Gérald Lacroix had received a written complaint from “Marie.” The alleged incidents occurred in late 2008 and early 2009 and were “much more serious” than those reported by Pamela Groleau, according to Golias Hebdo. (The article did not describe the alleged abuses.) At Lacroix’s request, Marie detailed her allegations in a six-page letter dated 9/13/2020 that the archbishop transmitted directly to the Pope. It appears that the Pope designated Fr. Servais to look into this allegation too: On 3/2/2021, according to Golias Hebdo, a relative of Marie received an email from Servais expressing his concern that Marie was a “sick person” who may have been “manipulated by a pressure group animated by political interests.” [Note that Servais sent this email regarding Marie just two days before interviewing Pamela Groleau.]
On 6/23/2021, Marie received a letter signed by Lacroix [see image of letter here] indicating that Ouellet had been the subject of a preliminary investigation under Vos estis lux mundi and informing her that Pope Francis had evaluated her claim and had found “no reason” to conduct a fuller investigation.
Following Golias Hebdo‘s January 2023 report, Ouellet issued a written statement, saying, “I deny having committed any reprehensible behaviour with regard to this woman.”
On 1/30/2023, twelve days after the Golias Hebdo report of a second allegation, the Vatican announced that the Pope had accepted Ouellet’s resignation as prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops and as president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. In a statement, Ouellet noted that having served three years beyond the standard retirement age of 75, it was time for him to “take on new challenges.” His resignation took effect 4/12/2023.
In March 2026, Ouellet’s defamation trial against Pamela Groleau took place at the Superior Court of Québec in Montreal. Three women who had worked with Ouellet described him as warm and kind. Two other women testified that Ouellet had subjected them to unwanted and inappropriate touching. Marie-Louise Moreau testified that shortly before a Sunday Mass in 1992, while she was working as a volunteer in the sacristy of Montreal’s Grand Séminaire, Ouellet placed himself behind her and rubbed his pelvis against her buttocks; then-Father Ouellet was seminary rector at the time. Another woman, Mélissa Trépanier, testified that in 2014, at the end of an evening that she and her fiancé spent with Ouellet at his home, the cardinal put his hand inside the front of her sweater and slipped in a $50 bill. Trépanier later wrote to Pope Francis about the incident, at the suggestion of Québec’s archbishop Gérald Lacroix. Ouellet denied wrongdoing in both cases, but admitted in court to the 2014 incident, describing it as “an unfortunate gesture” and “clumsy” but with “no sexual connotation whatsoever.”
On 8/31/2026, the Quebec Superior Court published Judge Martin Castonguay’s 52-page ruling in Ouellet’s civil defamation case against Pamela Groleau. The judge ruled emphatically in favor of Ouellet, stating that Groleau had falsely accused him “recklessly and even maliciously.” The judge wrote that Groleau had altered her description of the four alleged incidents, eventually describing just one – Ouellet’s alleged touching of her buttocks — as sexual assault. Castonguay also wrote that the damage to Ouellet’s reputation had been “amplified” by his inclusion in a class action suit, where he was accused along with pedophile clergy, “thereby equating Cardinal Ouellet, in the eyes of the ‘ordinary citizen,’ with that group of individuals.” He ordered Groleau to pay Ouellet the full amount — $100,000 Canadian dollars — he sought.
Judge Castonguay also stated that the allegations by two women who testified to inappropriate touching by Ouellet were irrelevant or implausible. He discounted the testimony of Marie-Louise Moreau, on the basis that: 1) the “modus operandi” she described bore no “resemblance whatsoever to the actions alleged by Ms. Groleau in the class action,” and 2) the Sunday Masses cited by Moreau occurred at the chapel of the Collège de Montréal, according to two defense witnesses, not at the Grand Séminaire, where Moreau said the unwanted contact took place. The judge said that Moreau’s identification of the wrong location proved “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that Ouellet had not perpetrated the inappropriate action. As for Mélissa Trépanier’s testimony, the judge reportedly affirmed Ouellet’s description of it as innocent mistake, noting also that Trépanier’s account of the alleged incident during the trial wasn’t entirely consistent with the description in the letter she had sent to Pope Francis.
As of 9/2/2026, there were no reports that Pamela Groleau would file an appeal.