|  | Bishops Lied and Covered Up
 By Mary Raftery
 Irish Times
 November 27, 2009
 
 http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2009/1127/1224259545384.html
 [This feature includes:• Church 
        'Routinely Covered Up' Child Sexual Abuse for 30 Years, by Carl O'Brien 
        and Patsy McGarry, Irish Times (11/27/09)
 • Vatican 
        and Nuncio Ignored Letters on Abuse, by Patsy McGarry and Paddy Agnew, 
        Irish Times (11/27/09)
 • Murphy 
        Report: Background and Composition, by Patsy McGarry and Carol Coulter, 
        Irish Times (11/27/09)
 • 30 
        Years of Church and State Cover-Up of Child Sex Abuse, by Paul Cullen, 
        Irish Times (11/27/09)
 • Cult 
        of Loyal Obedience at Heart of Lies and Cover-Up, by Patsy McGarry, 
        Irish Times (11/27/09)
 • Garda 
        Connivance in Stifling Abuse Inquiries Deplored, by Carol Coulter, 
        Irish Times (11/27/09)
 • Abuse 
        Continued for Years Due to Protection of Priests, by Carl O'Brien, 
        Irish Times (11/27/09)
 • Bishops 
        Lied and Covered Up, by Mary Raftery, Irish Times (11/27/09)]
 
 The report shows that what lies at the heart of the Catholic Church in 
        Ireland is a profound and widespread corruption, perpetrated by liars, 
        child sex abusers and those at the very top who covered up their crimes, 
        writes MARY RAFTERY
 
 THERE IS one searing, indelible image to be found in the pages of the 
        Dublin 
        diocesan report on clerical child abuse. It is of Fr Noel Reynolds, 
        who admitted sexually abusing dozens of children, towering over a small 
        girl as he brutally inserts an object into her vagina and then her back 
        passage.
 
 That object is his crucifix.
 
 The report details how this man was left as parish priest of Glendalough 
        (and in charge of the local primary school) for almost three years after 
        parents had complained about him to former archbishop of Dublin Desmond 
        Connell during the 1990s.
 
 In 1997, he was finally moved and appointed as chaplain to the National 
        Rehabilitation Hospital in Dún Laoghaire.
 
 The report helpfully informs us that there were 94 children aged 18 or 
        under as inpatients here. The hospital authorities were told nothing of 
        Reynolds's past or of suspicions that he was a child abuser.
 
 This kind of callous disregard for the safety of children is found over 
        and over again in the report. Bishops lied, cheated and covered up, almost 
        as a matter of course, in a display of relentless cynicism spanning decades. 
        Children were blithely sacrificed to protect priests, the institution 
        and its assets. It is, consequently, difficult to avoid the conclusion 
        that what lies at the heart of the Catholic Church (at least in Ireland) 
        is a profound and widespread corruption.
 
 The Dublin report divides the bulk of its analysis into chapters devoted 
        to individual priest abusers. But reading through the stomach-churning 
        details of their crimes, another parallel reality appears.
 
 Behind almost each one of these paedophiles was at least one bishop (often 
        more) who knew of the abuse, but failed to protect children.
 
 Some of them, Pontius Pilate-like, washed their hands, merely reporting 
        it up the line. Others actively protected the criminals in their midst 
        by destroying files and withholding information. Their handling of complaints 
        is variously described as "particularly bad", "disastrous" 
        and "catastrophic".
 
 Dermot Ryan stands out as the most callous of the Dublin archbishops. 
        He failed properly to investigate complaints against at least six of the 
        worst offending priests.
 
 Kevin MacNamara was little better, but his tenure was considerably briefer, 
        limiting some of the damage he did.
 
 John Charles McQuaid is severely criticised in one case, but it was not 
        within the commission's remit to examine his reign in any significant 
        detail. His response to the pornographic photos of two children taken 
        by one of his priests is a damning indictment of the impact of priestly 
        celibacy. He viewed the criminal act as an expression of "wonderment" 
        by the priest at the nature of the female body.
 
 And what of Desmond Connell, perhaps the most reviled of them all? A complex 
        picture emerges of a man unsuited to the task facing him, attempting to 
        deal with the enormous scale of abuse in the archdiocese, and ultimately 
        failing. While he did, for instance, engage with the civil authorities, 
        unlike his predecessors, he, nonetheless, continued to maintain secrecy 
        over much of what the diocese knew of their child-abusing priests.
 
 As for the many Dublin auxiliary bishops, two stand out as being particularly 
        awful. There is arguably enough evidence in this report to send bishops 
        James Kavanagh (now deceased) and Donal O'Mahony (retired) to prison for 
        failing to report crimes. Or at least, there would be if there existed 
        such an offence. Incredibly, there is none.
 
 We certainly used to have one; called misprision of felony, it was conveniently 
        dropped from the statute books in 1998 when the felony laws changed. The 
        effect was that no priest, bishop, or indeed lay person, could be charged 
        with failing to report criminal activity of which they were aware.
 
 What a sigh of relief the bishops of Ireland must have breathed.
 
 The report describes Bishop O'Mahony's involvement in the cases of 13 
        priests from its sample of 46 under investigation. It mentions that he 
        was aware of allegations against several more. His cover-up over his 21 
        years in office was extensive.
 
 Bishop Kavanagh directly attempted to pervert the course of justice by 
        seeking to influence one Garda investigation and by convincing a family 
        to drop a complaint against another priest. He appears at various stages 
        in a number of other cases, always failing to act to protect children.
 
 Bishop Donal Murray of Limerick is also indicted as having handled a number 
        of complaints badly. He will have very serious questions to answer over 
        the coming days.
 
 Recently retired bishop of Ossory Laurence Forristal equally stands condemned, 
        which is all the more egregious as he was in charge of the archdiocese's 
        efforts during the 1990s to respond to the crisis and draw up child protection 
        guidelines.
 
 Bishops James Moriarty of Kildare and Leighlin, retired Bishop Brendan 
        Comiskey and Auxiliary Bishop of Dublin Eamon Walsh also all knew of complaints 
        of abuse at various stages.
 
 A week before the broadcast in 2002 of RTÉ television's Prime Time Cardinal 
        Secrets (which led to the establishment of the Dublin commission), Cardinal 
        Connell engaged in a pre-emptive strike. He had refused to appear on the 
        programme. He chose instead to circulate each of his 200 parishes with 
        a letter read out at every Mass that Sunday. In it, he apologised for 
        the failures of the past, but blamed them on a lack of understanding within 
        the church of paedophilia.
 
 The commission is categorical in its refusal to accept this plea of ignorance 
        as an excuse. It refers bluntly to the inconsistency between such claims 
        and the decision in 1986 to take out an insurance policy to protect church 
        assets from abuse victims.
 
 At that time, we are told that the archdiocese knew of allegations of 
        child sex abuse against 20 of its priests.
 
 The report further notes the documented history of the church's detailed 
        awareness of paedophilia as both crime and sin spanning the past 2,000 
        years. The first reference dates from AD 153.
 
 Finally, the report refers to the fact that archbishop Ryan displayed 
        as early as 1981 a complete understanding of both the recidivist nature 
        of paedophilia and of the devastating damage it caused to child victims.
 
 There had been a consistent denial from church authorities that anyone 
        knew anything about either of these key factors until very recently.
 
 Perhaps most damning of all is the report's findings as to the general 
        body of priests in Dublin. While it gives credit to a small few who courageously 
        pursued complaints, it adds that "the vast majority simply chose 
        to turn a blind eye".
 
 What emerges most clearly from the report is that priests, bishops, archbishops 
        and cardinals had the greatest difficulty in telling right from wrong, 
        and crucially that their determination of what constituted wrongdoing 
        was vastly different from that of the population at large.
 
 This fact is worthy of reflection on the part of all those who remain 
        connected to the church through its continuing and often central involvement 
        in the provision of services such as education and health throughout the 
        country.
 
 In 2003, ex-governor of Oklahoma Frank Keating drew parallels between 
        the behaviour of some US Catholic bishops and the Cosa Nostra. It drew 
        a storm of protest, and he resigned from his position as chairman of the 
        church-appointed oversight committee on child abuse.
 
 However, it is not too far-fetched a comparison to the Irish church in 
        the light of the three investigations into its behaviour we have had to 
        date.
 
 The organised, premeditated pattern of secrecy and concealment of crime 
        is worthy of the world's most notorious criminal fraternity.
 
 Mary Raftery is a freelance journalist who, with reporter Mick Peelo, 
        produced and directed the documentary Cardinal Secrets
   
 
 |  |