COMMENTARY: Three aspects to consider: the process, the personage and the penalty.
In June 2024, the head of the Vatican communications department, Paolo Ruffini, vigorously defended his office’s continued use of the artwork of Father Marko Rupnik on the Vatican website. He argued that it was premature to judge Father Rupnik’s guilt regarding the many charges of sexual abuse of consecrated women he faces, and that “removing, deleting, destroying art … is not a Christian response.”
On Monday, Father Rupnik’s artwork was gone from the Vatican website, without explanation from Ruffini or anyone else. The removal came just days after Pope Leo XIV met with the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors, so the simplest explanation is that the commission asked the Holy Father to cease using the art and Pope Leo agreed. Cardinal Seán O’Malley, president of the commission, had already made that request publicly last June in response to Ruffini’s…
View Cache
If nothing changes, most nuns thinking of disclosing will take heed of the punitive consequences of disclosure already in the public domain and will decide that silence is by far the safer option.
View Cache